The Liberal Senate Forum

Connect

facebook Ideas Forum youtube flickr

Meet Senator

Larry Campbell

The Hon. Larry W. Campbell, M.B.A. One of Vancouver’s best-known and most admired citizens, Senator Larry W. Campbell served as mayor from 2002-2005 after a distinguished and high profile career primarily in law enforcement and death investigation. Since August 2, 2005, he has represented the province of British Columbia for the Senate.

Offshore Drilling

More on...

Share

Feedback

Read the comments left on this page or add yours.
Published by Senator Grant Mitchell on 27 July 2010

The recent BP offshore drilling disaster has raised the proverbial red flag on Canadian offshore drilling operations. It has raised the question as to whether our offshore drilling policies, procedures, regulatory regime and technologies are sufficiently better than those in the US. Are the risks of a similar disaster in Canadian waters really less than they are in the US?

I should say at the outset, that the Chair of the Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources , Conservative Senator David Angus, brought the idea of studying the offshore drilling issue to me, as Deputy Chair of the Committee, shortly after the BP problem began. Our committee has been involved in a lengthy and in-depth study of the need for an energy strategy in Canada, considering supply and demand questions, security and the impact of climate change. He suggested that we detour, if only slightly, to give a timely look at the offshore drilling situation in Canada.

Senate committees are noted for the excellent work they do, largely in a spirit of non-partisanship. Our committee heard from many witnesses, from industry, government, and environmental groups over about a 4 week period.

One observation that raises the stakes on this issue is that 13% of Canada’s conventional production comes from offshore sites. A concern noted by Senator Angus was that polls were saying that the majority of Canadians want drilling offshore stopped.

On the one hand, there were some reassuring things. Notably, right now, there is only one discovery (as opposed to production) drilling operation in Canada’s waters. It is located far off the coast of Newfoundland. There are none in the north right now. Moreover, I got the impression that the NEB (the National Energy Board) which has a role in the regulation of this drilling has a history of great experience and competence. We have had in Canada a culture of rigorous regulation unlike what some are suggesting may have been the case in the US.

There is no doubt that the companies we heard from care greatly about doing this work properly and have a high degree of professionalism and competence. They are aware of the risks and take great precautions. We learned that the ships that are used for some offshore drilling have three sets of emergency shut-off technologies. That is the case with the one well being drilled offshore in Canada at this time.

Reassuring in a perverse way also is that Canadians now have the chance to study the BP case and see where our approaches have been better and where we might have to improve.

On the other hand, there are questions that have to be answered before Canadians can be reassured that the procedures, policies, regulatory regime and/or technologies are sufficiently different between Canada and the US that we can have some comfort that what happened there will not happen here or, if it does, we can cap the problem quickly. One major issue is the differences incumbent to drilling in the north where very cold water and ice cover makes for problems not encountered in the Gulf case. Another issue is whether there is a clear chain of command amongst the NEB, the two provincial offshore drilling regulatory boards and industry should a worst case scenario happen. This appeared to be a problem with the Gulf case.

We got many sincere answers from witnesses. And, many of these answers were from industry participants. But, in the face of their reassurances that we have nothing to worry about, really, Senator Tommy Banks kept saying: “Yes, but BP probably was saying the same things right up until the blowout.” The real issues are whether we are really different in critical ways. There will always be some risk but how do we assess what risk we are prepared to take?

 

This summer, the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources released its report on the state of offshore drilling in Canada. Please click here for the report (pdf).

Recent Posts

A Tribute to the Veterans of D-Day

20 Jun, 2014 | By Senator Claudette Tardif | Seventy years ago, thousands of Canadian soldiers landed on the French shore amid a sea of flames to help liberate Europe and restore democracy.

Arctic Sovereignty—Part Five

16 May, 2014 | By Senator Charlie Watt | In December 2013, Canada made its submission to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Canada failed to include any reference to Inuit rights to the Arctic.

Senate Reform

29 Apr, 2014 | By Senator Grant Mitchell | The Supreme Court of Canada did not kill the possibility of meaningful Senate reform with its recent ruling on term limits, elections and abolition. Don't let anyone tell you that it did.

Notes on Supreme Court Decision on Senate Reference

25 Apr, 2014 | By Senator James Cowan | The Supreme Court of Canada today confirmed what Senate Liberals have been saying since 2007 about Mr Harper’s proposed changes to the Senate.

Canada's Aboriginal people: What's in a name?

24 Mar, 2014 | By Senator Charlie Watt | Some people are confused by the different terms used for Canada’s Aboriginal people.
« 1 2 3 4 5  ... » 
Recycle

You can retrieve this page at:
http://www.liberalsenate.ca/Blog/10332_Offshore-Drilling.
Please recycle this document.