The Liberal Senate Forum


facebook Ideas Forum youtube flickr

Meet Senator

Art Eggleton

The Hon. Art  Eggleton, P.C. Senator Art Eggleton has served the people of Canada and the city of Toronto in public office for over 35 years. He was appointed to the Senate on March 24, 2005, by the Rt Honourable Paul Martin and represents the province of Ontario.

Budget 2012

More on...



Read the comments left on this page or add yours.
Published by Senator Grant Mitchell on 05 April 2012

Here are some of my thoughts about the first Conservative majority budget:

1. It confirms for me that it is very unlikely that they will ever balance the budget, without fudging the figures like they did in their Ontario government in the late 1990s. They are cutting only $5.5 billion while at the same time continuing with a crime agenda that will cost as much as $19 billion over the next 5 to 10 years. And they continue in their commitment to the F35 jets which to this point are literally priceless and are only getting more expensive.

I am convinced that they cannot truly balance the budget because they are driven to spend ideologically. Management is of lesser priority than their ideological impulses and eludes them when the crunch comes.

2. They have literally gutted environmental programs, particularly any directed at climate change. Shockingly, they shut down the National Roundtable on the Economy and the Environment completely. They have laid off upwards of 1000 employees in the Environment Department, many of them scientists. They have shut down pretty much every program designed to help Canadians reduce GHG emissions. They have reneged on Kyoto.

3. And, now they are attacking charities (read environmental groups) for participating in the public policy debate in this country. The Conservatives morph from argument to argument; as one is exposed for the unfounded, biased attack that it is, they move to another. First, it is that charitable groups should not be allowed to take money from foreign sources, implying that somehow this costs taxpayers something because this money is charitable.

But, of course, foreign foundations do not pay taxes in their own countries, let alone in Canada. So, they then morph to the argument that Canadian charities (read environmental groups) should not get the benefit of charitable tax treatment for the money they raise even from Canadian donors and be able to participate in public policy debate (read debate and the environmental review process on oil sands projects).

Now, the budget is calling for charities to be required to give more information about their "political" activities. And, it gives $8.0 million to CRA to review this issue. Let's remember that no charity is allowed to support political parties and maintain their charitable status now.

This will have the effect of creating a chill over environmental groups that have every right to participate in the environmental debate in this country.

Who is to decide which political activity is acceptable and which is not? What about the fundamental groups and churches that have charitable status and certainly engage in "political" debate?

4. They say they are cutting $5.0 billion over 3 years leading people to believe that they are reducing spending. But, in fact spending is going up from $276 billion to $296 billion over that time.

Recent Posts

Canada's Aboriginal people: What's in a name?

24 Mar, 2014 | By Senator Charlie Watt | Some people are confused by the different terms used for Canada’s Aboriginal people.

Arctic Sovereignty: Part Four

7 Mar, 2014 | By Senator Charlie Watt | Dr. Dalee Sambo Dorough, an Expert Member and Vice Chairperson on the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), shares my opinion that “no state should be able to use the UNCLOS regime and treaty provisions to claim portions or territory of the Arctic Ocean and Seabed that Inuit occupy and have rights to unless Inuit are engaged and ultimately consent.”

30th Anniversary

3 Mar, 2014 | By Senator Charlie Watt | I have just celebrated an anniversary here in the Senate and would like to thank my colleagues for their kind words.

Arctic Sovereignty: Part Three

28 Feb, 2014 | By Senator Charlie Watt | Over the past year, Dr. Claudio Aporta of Dalhousie University has prepared a report titled, Inuit Trails and Arctic Occupancy. His work is unique, as it’s the first to clearly compile and analyze historical maps of Inuit occupancy of the Arctic. Dr. Aporta used written histories, often based on other historical documents and oral history.

Arctic Sovereignty: Part Two

21 Feb, 2014 | By Senator Charlie Watt | In the Fall of 2012, the Senate Liberal Caucus commissioned a report by Peter Hutchins Legal Inc, titled Inuit: Canada’s Treaty Partners or Free Agents? An Argument for an Inuit-Canada Joint Approach to Addressing Sovereignty Disputes in the Arctic.
« 1 2 3 4 5  ... » 

You can retrieve this page at:
Please recycle this document.