The Liberal Senate Forum


facebook Ideas Forum youtube flickr

Meet Senator

Paul Massicotte

The Hon. Paul J. Massicotte, B.Comm., C.A. Senator Paul Massicotte was appointed to the Senate on June 26, 2003 by Prime Minister Jean Chrétien. He represents the province of Québec and the Senatorial Division of De Lanaudière.


Senate reform would not benefit New Brunswick

More on...



Read the comments left on this page or add yours.
Published by Senator Joseph Day on 13 June 2012

I was disappointed to read that Premier David Alward is introducing legislation in support of the Harper government's senate reform agenda.

I have stated in multiple speeches and interviews that while I support Parliamentary reform, including Senate reform, electing senators would undermine the role of the Senate as that of an independent institution of sober second thought.

The appointment process is intended to allow senators to be free to consider legislation from the House of Commons, unhindered of any political, partisan implications. This means that senators can make decisions based on what is good for Canadians, with a focus on their home province, rather than what is good for any party's political fortunes. This is most apparent in the work of Senate committees, where highly regarded, in-depth reports on the issues of the day are regularly produced. An elected Senate would simply mirror the House of Commons, becoming a redundant arena for dueling political interests, and would inevitably lead to a deadlock between the two houses. What is needed is a more transparent appointment process, not another House of Commons!

Some have argued that the appointment process is undemocratic. Those same individuals would argue that legislation is delayed and bogged down once it reaches the Red Chamber. This latter complaint is however a compliment to the Senate for taking the time necessary to do its job in considering a specific Bill's potential impact on our provinces and minorities, rather than rubber stamping the legislation in the name of political expediency. "Democratic" does not mean "elected;" it implies the concepts of accountability, transparency and independence to perform its intended role.

Historically, the Senate does not kill legislation it receives from the House of Commons, but rather makes amendments after close study; more amendments to proposed legislation are made in the Senate than the House of Commons. The exception occurred last year when the Conservative majority in the Senate killed Bill C-311, an independent members Bill that would require Canada to cut our greenhouse gas emissions. The Bill was voted down in the Senate before any study could be done, any debate could be had or any amendments could be made. The Bill made it past the Conservative minority in the House of Commons at the time, but was defeated by a Conservative majority in the Senate because it did not fit with the governing party's agenda. If the Conservative senators had followed the Senate tradition of independent study and thought, this would not have happened. This process illustrates what a partisan Senate would look like.

This leads to another concern, which is that Premier Alward believes the Conservative government's Senate reform agenda is democratic in the first place. Prime Minister Harper has complained of a Liberal dominated Senate in the past, yet this is no longer the case. Currently, Prime Minister Harper has appointed 48 of the 105 Senators currently in the Red Chamber. He has even re-appointed those who gave up their Senate seats, ran in Parliamentary elections and were rejected by voters. With his appointees in control of the Senate, we have seen little interest on the part of the Prime Minister in moving the bill forward. Premier Alward is proposing legislation in New Brunswick in reaction to a bill in Parliament which may never be passed.

Closer inspection of Bill C-7, the Senate Reform Act, reveals that Senate elections would simply serve the purpose of suggesting names for the Prime Minister to "consider" for appointment. Whether the Prime Minister would abide by the electorate's decision is another matter. This would mean that New Brunswickers would spend the time and money holding elections that would not be legally binding. Similar legislation in Alberta has been boycotted by many of the voters in that province.

Let us give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that the Premier read the fine print of Bill C-7. We must ask the question then, why would he move to support piecemeal Senate reform in this guise? The Senate, as it exists today, is of great benefit to New Brunswick and the Atlantic region in general, given that population and development is shifting the western portion of our country. Any move to fully reform the Senate or the House of Commons would surely see our region lose seats or our share of the overall seats. The current structure of the Senate ensures a louder voice for Atlantic Canada in Ottawa. Therefore, there must be a hidden motive behind the Premier's recent decision to introduce this legislation. If it is to curry favour with his political companions in Ottawa, there are better ways to go about that, so as to benefit our province.

I strongly believe the appointment process for senators as well as judges, though not perfect, is to the benefit of all Canadians. That being said, I would support real moves to see the Senate's democratic legitimacy increased, such as a vetting process for appointments that would see the input of more than just the Prime Minister's Office.

Instead, the Senate Reform Act proposed by Mr. Harper and supported by our Premier would see millions of dollars spent on a questionable voting process. Why the Premier thinks such a process would benefit New Brunswick is confusing at best.

Recent Publications

Autism families are still in crisis

31 Mar, 2014 | By Senator Jim Munson | We will mark World Autism Awareness Day on April 2. Last month, a select committee of the Ontario Legislative Assembly published an interim report on developmental services in Ontario. The final recommendations will be submitted to the Ontario government in May.

Accountability & transparency for the whole of Parliament

25 Mar, 2014 | By Senator Percy Downe | I’ve spoken with many Canadians recently who’ve expressed that they want more transparency and greater accountability from their Government. They don’t want catch phrases. They don’t want promises. They want action; and given that both the Senate and the House of Commons represent the key link between Canadians and their government, it is our responsibility to keep up with these public demands.

The myth of Harper’s job creation record

4 Feb, 2014 | By Senator Art Eggleton | With close to 46,000 Canadians getting pink slips in December, Canadians are getting the picture that the economy is not as rosy as the Harper government says it is. We have been fed the myth that our economy is not only doing fine, but that we are world leaders. Unfortunately, we are not.

Ottawa Senators Become Free Agents: The New Senate

4 Feb, 2014 | By Senator Jim Cowan | On Wednesday, the Senate of Canada entered a new era. Justin Trudeau announced that the 32 sitting Liberal Senators would no longer be members of the national Liberal Caucus. His goal: to do his part to remove the excessive partisanship that has interfered with the Senate fulfilling its role of “sober second thought”. He promised Canadians that when he becomes Prime Minister, he will also end patronage appointments to the Senate, putting in place an open, transparent, and non-partisan public process for appointing and confirming senators.

The Case for an Unelected Senate

8 Dec, 2013 | By Senator Art Eggleton | Canadian Senators frequently express frustration at getting little or no attention for the work they do -- the comprehensive policy studies, and the "sober second thought" of legislation from the House of Commons. And when the spotlight does finally settle on the upper chamber, it is over the alleged misbehaviour of a few. Without doubt, such matters need full investigation, full disclosure, and appropriate corrective action for any misdeeds.
« 1 2 3 4 5  ... » 

You can retrieve this page at:
Please recycle this document.