The Liberal Senate Forum


facebook Ideas Forum youtube flickr

Meet Senator

Nick Sibbeston

The Hon. Nick G. Sibbeston, B.A., LL.B. Appointed to the Senate by the Rt. Honourable Jean Chrétien, Senator Nick Sibbeston represents the Northwest Territories and the Senatorial Division of the Northwest Territories. He has served in the Senate of Canada since September 2, 1999.

Statements & Hansard

Northwest Territories - Devolution of Land, Water and Resource Management

More on...



Read the comments left on this page or add yours.
Statement made on 16 February 2011 by Senator Nick Sibbeston

Hon. Nick G. Sibbeston:

Honourable senators, a few weeks ago, the Governments of Canada and the Northwest Territories signed an agreement in principle to negotiate devolution. Devolution will transfer authority for the management of land, water and resources on Crown land from Canada to the GNWT. The agreement is a good thing. There are also provisions for resource revenue sharing.

This agreement is historic. Every premier of the NWT has aspired to transfer province-like powers from the federal government to the territorial governments. When negotiations are complete, the Government of the Northwest Territories will have virtually the same control over their resources as any province in southern Canada.

Two regional Aboriginal organizations signed on as parties to these negotiations. The remaining five Aboriginal groups in the North did not sign. They have expressed varying opposition to the agreement. Some feel it will impede their own land claim negotiations. Others feel the financial terms are not sufficient.

It is essential, however, for the Government of the Northwest Territories and all Aboriginal groups in the North to come to terms. I encourage them to be realistic, remembering that politics is the art of the possible.

Devolution of land and resources is not a surprise to anyone in the North. Three of the signed land claim agreements explicitly anticipate devolution. At one time or another, all Aboriginal groups have participated in the current negotiations that have been under way since 2001.

The agreement in principle makes it clear that Aboriginal rights will not be abrogated or derogated by the devolution process. When a conflict exists between a land claim or self-government agreement and the final devolution agreement, the former prevails. Moreover, devolution also impacts the management of Crown lands and not the jurisdiction Aboriginal people have negotiated over their lands.

The devolution process envisions government-to-government negotiations between the Government of the Northwest Territories and Aboriginal governments to coordinate management in their respective jurisdictions to promote economic development and ensure environmental protection. It also includes a process to share in the resource revenues that will come to the North as a result of devolution.

Devolution is not a new issue. It has been ongoing since the territorial governments moved North in 1967. The last major devolution — health services, the administration of justice and the management of forestry — occurred during my time in the Northwest Territories cabinet.

There were those at the time who opposed that devolution for many of the same reasons. Yet, because devolution gives control to the people of the North through time, hard work and made-in-the-North programs, people see the merits of devolution.

We have always said in the North, anything the federal government can do, we can do better in the North.

Recent Statements from Liberal Senators

First Nations Control of First Nations Education Bill

10 Apr, 2014 | By Senator Lillian Eva Dyck | Honourable senators, I would like to say a few words about this motion. I am definitely in support of it. The idea of a First Nations education act is critically important to the welfare of First Nations across Canada, and especially to our young people.

Income Inequality

10 Apr, 2014 | By Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette | What does the government intend to do to learn from the financial crisis, reduce wealth inequality, and follow the lead of other jurisdictions that have started to rein in compensation that has nothing to do with the productivity of the people who earn the average salary of a Canadian in half a day?

Broadcast of Senate Proceedings

10 Apr, 2014 | By Senator Grant Mitchelll | What is the leader's personal opinion about televising the Senate?

National Pharmacare

10 Apr, 2014 | By Senator Art Eggleton | That was supported unanimously in the Senate, so I take it, senator, that you would be willing to now advance this idea to the government.

National Pharmacare

10 Apr, 2014 | By Senator James Cowan | My question is: Will this government put National Pharmacare on the agenda?
« 1 2 3 4 5  ... » 

You can retrieve this page at:
Please recycle this document.